Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Righteous Kill



It's been 13 years since Heat and the comparisons to the 1995 masterpiece starring these same two method acting powerhouses will be inevitable. Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro were in top form a decade ago when they shared the screen for the first time (both appeared in The Godfather Part II but never together).

Well, if Heat left big shoes to fill, I don't want to stack the deck even further against Righteous Kill by bringing up The Godfather.



That said, when these two hook up, I certainly expect huge things script-wise. It should take something truly epic, something that couldn't possibly be trusted in any other hands, to bring these two together. Their box office appeals might be waning slightly as they advance in years, but they should not be reuniting just to combine their drawing power and attempt to prove their box office relevance.

This film didn't reek of such an attempt, and since their target audiences are almost identical, it would be an almost futile attempt. This film was not in the sad vein of 88 Minutes, where I felt like I was watching Al Pacino wade his way through a movie-of-the-week script. In this case, we at least have a theatre-worthy script and production. It is just not quite DeNiro-plus-Pacino-worthy.

Pacino and DeNiro play two seasoned and grizzled cops on the hunt of a too-close-to-home serial killer of hard-to-convict criminals. Kind of like Dexter plus thirty years. The good news is that these two can still act. Whenever they're on the screen, they're doing what they do best. But maybe I've been spoiled by these guys for too long, so that I simply expect five stars from them all of the time.

The bad news is that they don't want to age too gracefully. I found the opening two minutes to be the worst part of the film. It was a random collage of the two of them shooting guns at the firing range, working out at the gym, and Pacino demonstrating that he is the finest chess player in existence (which is hardly ever revisited except in really blunt metaphors).

Anyway, when you have these two virtuosos at your disposal, you don't need to resort to clumsy patchwork "character building" montages to open a movie. It was the complete opposite of the manner in which we finally waited for the two to unite onscreen in Heat, and while the filmmakers undoubtedly (and wisely) avoided excessive parallels with the earlier film...this was just a bit too much, too fast for me.



That said, the movie did improve from there. It's worth watching. But if you have these two guys on a pedestal like so many of us do, your expectations may not be met. The supporting cast is solid, including the always-reliable Brian Dennehy (First Blood), John Leguizamo, Carla Gugino and even a solid performance by 50 Cent.



Lastly, here's a glimpse at the theatrical trailer.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Paul Newman: 1925-2008



Rest in peace.

Everything the man did and achieved speaks for itself. He doesn't need me to say anything for him.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford



With a title that long, it would have to a pretty long movie, and it is at around two and a half hours. This is a very well-made movie, with good acting and strong characters, but I'd be lying if I said they couldn't have packed the story into two hours even. It moves along a relaxed pace, which is nice to let you soak things in, but there were a few times where it dragged its legs just a bit. The film is certainly not fatally slow, however.

The performances are strong. Brad Pitt is on his game as Jesse James. Sam Rockwell always brings the goods, and now that Casey Affleck has come into his own as an actor, you are left with a strong 1-2-3 combo in the leads. Add in a supporting cast that includes Sam Shepard, Mary Louise Parker, Zooey Deschanel, underrated Ted Levine (Silence of the Lambs) and political-strategist-turned-cameo-actor James Carville, and you're left with a well-cast feature with all the players suited to their roles.

The musical score is unique and fits quite well the tone and message the filmmakers were trying to create. The cinematography and camera work are effective. And the piece was well written, delving at an appropriate depth (not to shallow, nor wallowing) into what types of actions and human traits truly define great men, and how a lack thereof can make those who aspired to greatness simply wish they had slipped between the cracks of history.

7.5 Kenneth Starr Reports out of 10.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Justice League - Fan Trailer

Fan trailers usually suck my left one, but this is pretty cool...

Friday, August 22, 2008

Chicago: Garbage Movie Review



CHICAGO (2002)

CABBAGE RATING: 2.5 Gerbils out of 10

CAST: Richard Gere, Renee Zellweger, Queen Latifah, John C. Reilly, Catherine Zeta Jones, Colm Feore, Lucy Liu, Taye Diggs

REVIEW

Thppppppppppppppppppp... That's the sound of me farting and I'm currently weighing the sound of my own flatulence against the sound of the music in Chicago. I give my farts 3.5 out of 10. I give Chicago 2.5.

I got dragged to this movie and my nuts nearly fell off as I was drowned in estrogen from the opening credits. Now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with a good chick flick like Terms of Endearment where there is good emotional content. And there is nothing wrong with movies that have a lot of music and singing in them like Purple Rain, when the music is good. But this just a two hour piece of tap dancing, wig wearing, skidmarks-causing crap and I'm going to have to watch Die Hard 100 times in a row before my balls even begin to grow back...

Don't watch this unless you are a chick that likes crap. The line should be drawn at Richard Gere hopping around while the director cuts to some dancing double from the knees down. Tappity tap tap tap. Don't let Renee Zellweger sing. Don't put Queen Latifah in form fitting outfits. Definitely don't put John C. Reilly in make-up. I would rather put my eyes in a jar of formaldehyde than watch this again.

Oh yeah, I think it won an Oscar or something (Best Picture 2002). That doesn't change the fact that I would rather make chili out of Osama Bin Laden's pubes and eat it than catch this masterpiece on DVD.

2.5 Gerbils out of 10. I'm going to stop writing while I am feeling generous before I downgrade it.

WATCH FOR:

Your testicles detaching from your body and crawling for the door in an effort to escape this experience.

Day of the Dead: Zombie Defecation



Man... There is no doubt that 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later redefined the zombie horror and set new standards in all kinds of areas: acting, tension, character development, plot pacing. All of these things are almost or wholly absent from most of the zombie movies that have preceded or followed.

And in the post-28 Days Later world, a movie like this, even though it features vastly superior camera work and cinematography to most other zombie movies, doesn't cut it. In all other regards it falls into the abyss that traps most movies of the genre: crappy acting, characters you don't care about or believe, a story that drags its way to the end at the pace of a classic zombie.

Mena Suvari (American Beauty, American Pie) stars as an army corporal. For someone with her resume and experience, you would really be expecting more at this point. But she was cast massively against type, and seemingly simply because "Hey, we can get Mena Suvari!"

Ving Rhames Pulp Fiction, MissionL Impossible is apparently forging a position for himself in the zombie flick culture, as his role here follows his stint in the Dawn of the Dead remake.

Anyway, the nostalgic love affair with George Romero zombies seems to be continuing in Hollywood, and in this case, they brought in Friday the 13th mastermind Steve Miner to spice it up. And from a filmmaking perspective, it's passable in comparison to most other zombie movies. But the fact of the matter is, you don't care about anyone and it quickly descends into "How many different ways can a person kill a zombie or a zombie kill a person..."

The script does try to go briefly into the psychological capabilities of a zombie, which deserves some credit. But again, had I cared at all about the people involved, it would have been far more effective. And the physical abilities of the zombies made no sense. Sometimes they run at human speed, sometimes they run like The Flash, sometimes they scramble upside down along the ceiling a turbo-charged spider. But at least when I was trying to figure out just how far their superhero powers extended, my mind and attention were engaged in some way.

So, if you're a zombie movie fanatic, then this one will probably be above average. It falls somewhere below the Dawn of the Dead remake, and above Zombies on a Plane.

Two Bruce Campbell chins out of Ten.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior



Man, oh man...

Well, I was treated by a friend in the industry today to a sneak preview of The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior, which features the long-awaited and somewhat-hyped debut of Randy Couture in a sizable role in a feature film. Yes, we saw him as MMA-cred window dressing in Redbelt and so on, but this new career path is how he has been filling his time since beating down Gabe Gonzaga and certainly seems to play into his plans for life after fighting.

And so as a fight fan, as a film fan, as a fan of the Natural, I really went into this hoping to find the movie at least watchable or palatable...

I really did...

And I couldn't...

Man, this movie was just straight up bad. It actually made me long for the quality acting, scripting and cinematography of the first Scorpion King. And believe me, I wasn't blown away by that movie. It made me long for the acting and scripting of The Mummy, which I also wasn't even that crazy about. The Mummy made me wish I was watching Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Now, the bad news is that the acting in this movie is just plain terrible. And unfortunately, that includes Randy Couture. Now, Randy is the kind of guy that if he puts his mind to it, he will excel. And I would not count him out of the acting game permanently based on this performance, should he dedicate himself to this craft the way he dedicated himself to his mastery of MMA. But the fact of the matter is, he's just not ready yet. He is at the stage of the game where he should be doing the acting equivalent of fighting weak opposition in Cage Rage. He just needs to train and practice.

Every once in a blue moon, a guy like The Rock or arguably Carl Weathers can make the jump from sports and skip his way along the acting learning curve quite quickly to a level of competence. But a quick transition from sports to quality acting is the exception to the rule and for every Rock, there are a dozen Shaqs, Howie Longs, Brian Bosworths...

Here is the good news for Randy Couture. Every actor sucked in this movie. They all did. The acting was shiznit across the board and that puts a lot of the blame squarely on the director's shoulders. Randy may not be a trained actor but undoubtedly the majority of the remaining cast are. If not, then let's string up the casting director. Randy deserves the most praise of anyone in this debacle simply because he is a beginner. If an aspiring fighter walks into the Lion's Den to learn how to fight, he's going to damn well do what Ken Shamrock tells him to do. And the same probably goes for Randy Couture walking onto a professional high-budget movie set. What else he is going to do but follow the direction available and give it what he's got with minimal training?

Anyway, it goes without saying that emotional truth is lacking on everyone's part. The story is weak. The cinematography is passable for a straight-to-DVD piece but is a notable drop from the last Scorpion King flick.

All in all, this movie is a turd and is notable only for the Couture factor. And that novelty wears off about 5 seconds in. Still, stick it out if you like. I'll wait for Randy's next round when he has a bit of seasoning.