Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Righteous Kill



It's been 13 years since Heat and the comparisons to the 1995 masterpiece starring these same two method acting powerhouses will be inevitable. Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro were in top form a decade ago when they shared the screen for the first time (both appeared in The Godfather Part II but never together).

Well, if Heat left big shoes to fill, I don't want to stack the deck even further against Righteous Kill by bringing up The Godfather.



That said, when these two hook up, I certainly expect huge things script-wise. It should take something truly epic, something that couldn't possibly be trusted in any other hands, to bring these two together. Their box office appeals might be waning slightly as they advance in years, but they should not be reuniting just to combine their drawing power and attempt to prove their box office relevance.

This film didn't reek of such an attempt, and since their target audiences are almost identical, it would be an almost futile attempt. This film was not in the sad vein of 88 Minutes, where I felt like I was watching Al Pacino wade his way through a movie-of-the-week script. In this case, we at least have a theatre-worthy script and production. It is just not quite DeNiro-plus-Pacino-worthy.

Pacino and DeNiro play two seasoned and grizzled cops on the hunt of a too-close-to-home serial killer of hard-to-convict criminals. Kind of like Dexter plus thirty years. The good news is that these two can still act. Whenever they're on the screen, they're doing what they do best. But maybe I've been spoiled by these guys for too long, so that I simply expect five stars from them all of the time.

The bad news is that they don't want to age too gracefully. I found the opening two minutes to be the worst part of the film. It was a random collage of the two of them shooting guns at the firing range, working out at the gym, and Pacino demonstrating that he is the finest chess player in existence (which is hardly ever revisited except in really blunt metaphors).

Anyway, when you have these two virtuosos at your disposal, you don't need to resort to clumsy patchwork "character building" montages to open a movie. It was the complete opposite of the manner in which we finally waited for the two to unite onscreen in Heat, and while the filmmakers undoubtedly (and wisely) avoided excessive parallels with the earlier film...this was just a bit too much, too fast for me.



That said, the movie did improve from there. It's worth watching. But if you have these two guys on a pedestal like so many of us do, your expectations may not be met. The supporting cast is solid, including the always-reliable Brian Dennehy (First Blood), John Leguizamo, Carla Gugino and even a solid performance by 50 Cent.



Lastly, here's a glimpse at the theatrical trailer.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Paul Newman: 1925-2008



Rest in peace.

Everything the man did and achieved speaks for itself. He doesn't need me to say anything for him.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford



With a title that long, it would have to a pretty long movie, and it is at around two and a half hours. This is a very well-made movie, with good acting and strong characters, but I'd be lying if I said they couldn't have packed the story into two hours even. It moves along a relaxed pace, which is nice to let you soak things in, but there were a few times where it dragged its legs just a bit. The film is certainly not fatally slow, however.

The performances are strong. Brad Pitt is on his game as Jesse James. Sam Rockwell always brings the goods, and now that Casey Affleck has come into his own as an actor, you are left with a strong 1-2-3 combo in the leads. Add in a supporting cast that includes Sam Shepard, Mary Louise Parker, Zooey Deschanel, underrated Ted Levine (Silence of the Lambs) and political-strategist-turned-cameo-actor James Carville, and you're left with a well-cast feature with all the players suited to their roles.

The musical score is unique and fits quite well the tone and message the filmmakers were trying to create. The cinematography and camera work are effective. And the piece was well written, delving at an appropriate depth (not to shallow, nor wallowing) into what types of actions and human traits truly define great men, and how a lack thereof can make those who aspired to greatness simply wish they had slipped between the cracks of history.

7.5 Kenneth Starr Reports out of 10.